![Eddie Woo](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 4 954
- 168 468 825
Eddie Woo
Australia
Приєднався 28 бер 2012
I teach mathematics at a comprehensive public high school in Sydney, Australia. I'm also an author (Woo's Wonderful World of Maths, It's a Numberful World, Eddie Woo's Magical Maths 1 & 2, Whodunnit Eddie Woo?) and TV host (Ultimate Classroom on Channel 10, Teenage Boss on ABC ME).
I think learning is awesome, and love being able to share what I've learned with others!
More information about me and my work here: misterwootube.com/about/
I think learning is awesome, and love being able to share what I've learned with others!
More information about me and my work here: misterwootube.com/about/
Normal Approximation to Binomial Distribution (example question)
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Переглядів: 2 304
Відео
Statistical Proportions (2 of 2: Basic example)
Переглядів 3 тис.9 годин тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Statistical Proportions (1 of 2: What are they?)
Переглядів 4,7 тис.16 годин тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Independent Events (2 of 2: Overlapping situations)
Переглядів 3,4 тис.День тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Independent Events (1 of 2: Thinking symbolically)
Переглядів 4,4 тис.14 днів тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Conditional Probability (4 of 4: Determining reduced sample space)
Переглядів 4,8 тис.14 днів тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Conditional Probability (3 of 4: Defective light bulbs)
Переглядів 5 тис.21 день тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Conditional Probability (2 of 4: Introductory example)
Переглядів 8 тис.21 день тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Conditional Probability (1 of 4: Establishing foundations)
Переглядів 10 тис.28 днів тому
More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
TeachCast with Eddie Woo (excerpt)
Переглядів 10 тис.3 місяці тому
Full interview available on the second channel: ua-cam.com/video/Lcs0t6cihI0/v-deo.html To view more episodes of TeachCast, visit: ua-cam.com/play/PLT6d9SvBTGMG4U9qBI5pNzuFe-qJhF-Ut.html Thanks to @teachnsw for producing and sharing this video! More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Ask Me Anything!
Переглядів 13 тис.4 місяці тому
Head over to the @sydney_uni channel to watch the other half of this video: ua-cam.com/video/OsjXU9Ju_J0/v-deo.html More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
🇺🇸 I'm visiting the United States!
Переглядів 12 тис.4 місяці тому
This has been a long time coming! US friends - if you have contacts or colleagues who might be interested in having me speak or run workshops, please reach out. More details available if you DM or email (info@misterwootube.com)!
What if I feel like mathematics isn’t for me? Eddie Woo on the Solutionists
Переглядів 15 тис.5 місяців тому
Listen to the full podcast episode: protect-au.mimecast.com/s/dmDGC91WPRTzLLAMPuoMtpF?domain=pod.fo More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Is growth mindset actually real? Eddie Woo on the Solutionists
Переглядів 10 тис.5 місяців тому
Listen to the full podcast episode: protect-au.mimecast.com/s/dmDGC91WPRTzLLAMPuoMtpF?domain=pod.fo More resources available at www.misterwootube.com
Is lifelong learning really possible? Eddie Woo on the Solutionists
Переглядів 8 тис.6 місяців тому
Is lifelong learning really possible? Eddie Woo on the Solutionists
Eddie Woo's Wonderful World of STEM | Studio 10
Переглядів 12 тис.7 місяців тому
Eddie Woo's Wonderful World of STEM | Studio 10
Jack the Hunter (2 of 2: Explaining the trick)
Переглядів 12 тис.7 місяців тому
Jack the Hunter (2 of 2: Explaining the trick)
Jack the Hunter (1 of 2: Performing the trick)
Переглядів 17 тис.8 місяців тому
Jack the Hunter (1 of 2: Performing the trick)
Question 30 (this year's HSC Mathematics Advanced exam)
Переглядів 145 тис.8 місяців тому
Question 30 (this year's HSC Mathematics Advanced exam)
Worked Probability Questions (3 of 3: Disease testing)
Переглядів 16 тис.9 місяців тому
Worked Probability Questions (3 of 3: Disease testing)
Worked Probability Questions (2 of 3: Selecting sock pairs)
Переглядів 10 тис.9 місяців тому
Worked Probability Questions (2 of 3: Selecting sock pairs)
Worked Probability Questions (1 of 3: Venn diagram)
Переглядів 12 тис.9 місяців тому
Worked Probability Questions (1 of 3: Venn diagram)
Circumcentre of a Triangle (2 of 2: Proving orthogonality)
Переглядів 8 тис.9 місяців тому
Circumcentre of a Triangle (2 of 2: Proving orthogonality)
Circumcentre of a Triangle (1 of 2: Finding the bisector vector)
Переглядів 8 тис.9 місяців тому
Circumcentre of a Triangle (1 of 2: Finding the bisector vector)
Vector Geometry Proofs (3 of 3: Using deductive vector logic)
Переглядів 7 тис.10 місяців тому
Vector Geometry Proofs (3 of 3: Using deductive vector logic)
Vector Geometry Proofs (2 of 3: Angle in a semicircle)
Переглядів 8 тис.10 місяців тому
Vector Geometry Proofs (2 of 3: Angle in a semicircle)
Vector Geometry Proofs (1 of 3: An unexpected quadrilateral property)
Переглядів 9 тис.10 місяців тому
Vector Geometry Proofs (1 of 3: An unexpected quadrilateral property)
9 News segment: Preparing for HSC exams
Переглядів 13 тис.10 місяців тому
9 News segment: Preparing for HSC exams
Cartesian & Vector Equations (3 of 3: Solving vector equations)
Переглядів 4,8 тис.10 місяців тому
Cartesian & Vector Equations (3 of 3: Solving vector equations)
9
I'm half way through and have no freaking clue why I keep watching if not by mere curiosity and great enthusiastic explanation. The abstraction have always been annoying to me but the mathematical prowess have still always been interesting, to lock things in a logical place of understanding and a mechanical processing that guides me between the unknown real shape of reality and my swimming through with my imagination gap filling 'power'.
Ans should be only 9
But shan't we obey BODMAS rule
Sir your videos are amazing but please work to reduce reverberations in your classroom
The Boss, Mr Hoskin, would not approve. Where are the Australians?
The answer is not 9 because what is we replace ÷ by /
Well, according to the rule there should only be one answer. That is 9. The rule is bodmas. First, you solve what's inside the Brackets, then "off" which is simply multiplication but with different sign. There's no "Off" in it, so next is Divide. Hence, we first do the brackets which equates to 3, then "off" but its absent, so we do division of 6 by 3 which equates to 3, then multiplication which equates to 9, the only answer according to me. Butttt...don't believe me. That guy's a profesional mathematician with far more experiece than me. If he's saying it can be both then it can be both. There must be something wrong with the explanation I gave.
its 7
6:2(1+2)=1 you always start with (x)
Since I'm not anything close to being a math guy, the only thing that I understand from this video is that it's a math class! Fantastic!
Obvious answer is mitochondria
9
It's Yes, 1
It's 9
To determine the value of the expression 6÷2(1+2), we need to follow the order of operations, often abbreviated as *PEMDAS/BODMAS:* P/B: Parentheses/Brackets E/O: Exponents/Orders (i.e., powers and square roots, etc.) MD: Multiplication and Division (from left to right) AS: Addition and Subtraction (from left to right) Let's break down the expression step by step: 1. Parentheses/Brackets: Evaluate inside the parentheses first. 1+2=3 So the expression becomes: 6÷2(3) 2. Multiplication and Division (from left to right): Perform the division and multiplication from left to right. Here we have two operations: division and multiplication. According to the order of operations, we proceed from left to right. 6÷2×3 First, perform the division: 6÷2=3 Then, multiply the result by 3: 3×3=9 Therefore, the expression evaluates to 9. *Explanation:* The confusion often arises because some might interpret the expression differently, grouping 2(3) together before performing the division. However, according to standard mathematical conventions (PEMDAS/BODMAS), multiplication and division are performed from left to right as they appear. Thus, the correct and mathematically logical interpretation of the expression 6÷2(1+2) is: 6÷2×3=3×3=9 *So, the answer is 9.*
This guy is wrong. The division symbol only holds true for the term after it (which is 2 in this case). If you wanted to include the (1+2) within that division process, you would have to write the equation like this : 6÷(2(1+2)). Then the answer would be 1. Another problem people I saw is that people don't know that if there is brackets without any symbol it implies you have to multiply. So 2(1+2) = 2 x (1+2). Follow these rules and you will see the correct answer is 9.
1
It's 9.
I actually had fun watching this
but how do you go from 0! to -1! with the same logic of from a^0 to a^-1? what do you divide it by?
Why isn't the binomial variance n*p*q?
Because of Law of Large Numbers
Wish I saw this before my maths exam 😭
I wish you had a full lesson on binomial theorem
I feel a desperate need to learn English because of your videos because I use the translator and I feel excluded. 🙂😭
Great to see CTHS is working on their assessments lol
Good luck from NYC! ❤ Have a great trip, it would be great to go to your lectures at NY. Wish you a well planned smooth journey in US 🎉
1st comment
1)6÷2(1+2) 2)6÷2×3 3)3×3=9
7:45 timestamp
9
That was fun :-)
What I personally think the reason for the principal argument to be restricted between -pi and pi is because of the ease of multiplication. When we multiply two or more complex numbers they elongate by the combined (product) modulus and rotate by the combined (sum) argument . The disjoint interval given for the principal argument helps if multiplication was considered as a transformation such that the product measures as 1+ 0i in the transformed coordinate system. When there are multiple complex numbers in the same argand plane this basis transformation could be helpfull. Some problems in physics are solved in such a way. Hope this helps.
Nice video ❤
#dayan kiriwaththuduva a mathematician says 1 divided by zero is postive or negative infinity so please come to an conclusion
the correct answer is 9. multiplication and division are at the same level , so you do them left to right . the problem becomes 3*3=9
Ambiguity is the worst. Use brackets to negate it to the best of your ability, because math isn’t supposed to be about finding different ways to interpret the same thing it’s about problem solving. This is stupid. We shouldn’t force ambiguity like this and should just use better notation. Brackets, use the / instead of divide by symbol, etc.
6÷2(2+1) = 6 ÷ 4 +2 = 3.5 💀💀💀💀 Lol just kidding
I did this with calculator and GOT 9 NOT 1
The answer is 9 obviously In mathematics we dont use ÷ symbol for the same reason The equation is (6/2)(1+2) And not 6/[2(1+2)] Thats why it is 9 And not 1 The (1+2) part is in numerator and not denominator
i thought it was 6
Do you treat juxtaposition with brackets as implied addition?
@@GanonTEK I’m just stupid
@@h0oa I've seen othere say 6 so I was wondering if it was specific to some countries maybe. Like how some say 0 is the answer as in some countries ÷ means subtract so 0 is correct there.
@@GanonTEK here is how i did it : (1+2) = 3 6/2 = 3 3+3 = 6 and the answer is wrong because it's been time for me doing math after graduating from high school.
great sirvm i am Ramesh from india, kindly make it with some activity
UGHH, why study in my class not as happy as here
It's 7
7 is wrong for the same reason 4(1+1)/2 = (4+4)/2 = 8/2 = 4 and not 4+4/2 = 4+2 = 6. Distribution brings terms into brackets, not out. A common misconception. Also, if what you are distributing is in the numerator (or denominator) before Distribution, then the result must still remain in the numerator (or denominator) after distribution or you're changing the question.
Then is it 1 or not @@GanonTEK
@@bhatuzair1212 1 is a valid answer. If you interpret multiplication by juxtaposition as implying grouping then 6÷2(1+2) means 6÷(2×(1+2)) which is 6÷(2+4) = 6÷6 = 1 If you interpret juxtaposition literally you instead get 6÷2×(1+2) which is (6÷2 + 6) = 3 + 6 = 9. It all comes down to which interpretation of multiplication by juxtaposition you use. It's seen as bad notation here. (6/2)(1+2) and 6/(2(1+2)) are both clear instead.
@@GanonTEK than you
9
Why did i came here ? Asn: just for entertainment😂
If you use BEDMAS then its 9
You get both 1 and 9 with BEDMAS. It depends on the interpretation of multiplication by juxtaposition used that determines 1 or 9.
There’s no way this equation could be 1 but 9, is just wrong to multiple 2 times 1+2 since you literally have a division right next the 2. You could either resolve the division first which will get you 3 and then multiply by (1+2) or solve 1+2 times 6/2. I don’t even think mathematically speaking that the answer 1 is correct in terms of order and rules.
Academically, multiplication by juxtaposition implies grouping so that makes 1 just as valid.
2:15 he is a magician as well 😂😂😂
WOW. Respect
awesome!